IMG_2094

WE THINK legal SOLUTIONs

Learn More
The stakes are high in divorce proceedings, and the presence of hidden assets can transform the landscape into a tempestuous battlefield. When one spouse attempts to obscure assets within a family trust, the equitable distribution of wealth becomes distorted, potentially leaving the other spouse at an unfair disadvantage.

Dangers of Hiding Assets Under Family Trust While Married In Community of Property

In the intricate dance of marriage, where trust and shared dreams intertwine, there exists a legal obligation for transparency and honesty. South Africa's marriage laws, particularly those pertaining to community of property unions, cast a spotlight on the question of whether it is legal for a spouse to conceal assets under the veil of a family trust. While the country firmly frowns upon sham or alter ego trusts, the legal battlefield surrounding this issue is anything but mundane.

In South Africa, the legal concept of a "community of property" marriage means that spouses share ownership of all assets acquired during their marriage. However, the situation can become intricate when one spouse attempts to hide assets through a family trust, especially given South Africa's stance against sham or alter ego trusts. This article delves into the legality of such actions, advice for the aggrieved spouse suspecting asset concealment, and the potential impact of hidden assets during divorce proceedings.

Legal Framework and the Battle Against Sham Trusts

In South Africa, the "Marriage in Community of Property" regime entails that assets acquired before and during the marriage become part of the joint estate shared equally by both spouses. The situation becomes intriguing when one spouse establishes a family trust with the aim of concealing assets from the joint estate. South African law, influenced by the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR), seeks to counter such actions, particularly when a trust is deemed to be a sham or alter ego trust. A sham trust is one that, while legally established, is found to be a mere facade intended to deceive creditors, third parties, or even the other spouse during divorce proceedings. An alter ego trust, on the other hand, is one that effectively functions as an extension of the creator's personal interests rather than a distinct legal entity.

The Aggrieved Spouse's Options

When one spouse suspects the other of hiding assets through a family trust, certain legal steps can be taken:

1. Gather Evidence: The aggrieved spouse should start by collecting any evidence that suggests the existence of hidden assets. This could include financial records, communication, and information regarding the establishment and operation of the family trust.

2. Legal Counsel: Engaging the services of a qualified family law attorney is essential. An attorney will not only guide the aggrieved spouse through the legal process but also assist in building a strong case against the suspected asset concealment.

3. Discovery Process: During divorce proceedings, the aggrieved spouse's legal team can utilize the discovery process to request information and documents related to the family trust. This can provide insights into the trust's purpose, beneficiaries, and assets held within it.

4. Forensic Investigation: In cases of complex asset concealment, a forensic accountant might be engaged to delve deeper into financial records and transactions to uncover any hidden assets.

Impact of Hidden Assets in Divorce Proceedings

Concealing assets during divorce proceedings can have significant repercussions:

1. Unfair Distribution: By hiding assets, the spouse attempting to conceal is unfairly reducing the value of the joint estate, which directly affects the equitable division of assets upon divorce.

2. Credibility and Trust: The court might view the actions of the spouse hiding assets as a breach of trust, potentially affecting their credibility and the court's perception of their overall behavior during the divorce proceedings.

3. Contempt of Court: Intentionally concealing assets could lead to allegations of contempt of court, further complicating the divorce process for the spouse involved.

4. Penalties and Costs: Courts in South Africa may impose penalties and award costs against the spouse found guilty of hiding assets, contributing to financial repercussions beyond the division of assets.

Conclusion

In the realm of South African marriage law, hiding assets through a family trust in a community of property marriage is a complex and legally contentious matter. The country's stance against sham or alter ego trusts reinforces the need for transparency and honesty during divorce proceedings. For a spouse who suspects asset concealment, seeking legal counsel, gathering evidence, and utilizing the appropriate legal mechanisms are crucial steps in ensuring a fair distribution of assets and upholding the principles of justice and integrity.